Tuesday, November 1, 2011

That Amusing Moment...

When words bite you in the ass. 




                                         
The next day when something happens that proves you wrong...




When you attempt to twist it around...


And when you then start to insult...



When you yourself have failed to comprehend things before you speak...

Pattinson was seen arriving at the apartment on the evening of October 29. A tired-looking Stewart was spotted arriving around lunchtime on October 31 Pattinson's rep Sarah Spear visited the apartment on the evening of October 30.

So...just because they never papped them together...it automatically means they were NEVER in the same place at the same time. Do we have that right? 

So then explain how ANY of that says...


Any TRULY knowledgeable person who is well educated in the workings of Public Relations (or just any SANE person will do) knows that the two people in question would have to, at the VERY LEAST, be in the same frame for it to garner any true publicity and make any money. How is this PR for the "greatest showmance of all time" if they aren't even on the SAME DAY?


We aren't quite sure why you're so dumb, Candy. We'd think any "law student" would know that the following is illegal behavior...


Posting about that on a social networking site seems a bit foolish, don't you think?
Not that we're surprised. You often make glaring mistakes such as this. 


But none of this really matters because obviously these pics (to which HollywoodLife had a post about yesterday) are all in an effort to draw attention from the Water for Elephants DVD release. 


So...are you saying that the Details outtakes that came out were in retaliation to Kristen being in GlamourUK? Oh. Wait. You did.

Wow. These two people who are supposed to be in a "Paid to Order PRomance" sure are doing a shit job of it...






2 comments:

  1. I believe if you reread the story you'll see that they made a mistake on the date Kristen arrived. Rob arrived the evening of the 29th, then Kristen had to arrived at lunchtime on the 30th, as in the next paragraph they have him leaving the night of the 30th and her leaving the morning of the 31st. She couldn't have arrived at lunch on the 31st if she was seen leaving the apt on the morning of the 31st. So I think they made an error on her arrival date, and that they were together there on the 30th until sometime in the night when Rob was seen leaving. Regardless it was the same apartment and anyone with any common sense knows what that means. Thanks for your great Blog, it's about time someone started calling these people on their ridiculous comments.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete